Earlier, I talked about the value of adding social media to a nonprofit’s communications toolkit. Social media is free. Millions use it every day. So why not dive in?
Why not? Because a poorly run social media campaign may hurt your organization by making it look unprofessional, unhip or unpopular. As the marketing firm CAWOOD says, don’t use social media if you don’t have the time and resources to put into the campaign or if you don’t understand the specific social media platform you sign up for.
The key is to treat Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Pinterest and any other social media platform as an individual community with distinct expectations about what you’ll say to them and how you’ll say it. Whatever you do, don’t fall into the habit of treating your social media accounts as online versions of your quarterly newsletter.
Willamette Valley CSA farmer Derek Brandow introduces a
potential customer to his flock.
On the
surface, the Slow Food message is simple: Everyone deserves access to “good, clean, and fair food.” Convincing U.S. consumers to
buy into that message, however, is a herculean task.
Yet over the past two decades,
organic food sales have skyrocketed while Consumer Supported Agriculture (CSA) farms and thousands of farmers markets have sprung up across the
country. Why is that? Has the Slow Food movement successfully countered the dominant
American food narrative, which says the best food, even if not nutritious, is
quick, cheap and convenient?
To
learn more about Slow Food USA’s communications strategies, I recently
dug into Ashli Quesinberry Stokes’ academic study on efforts to brand the
movement, recruit supporters and combat the agribusiness advertising blitz.
For those of us who didn't grow up in the age of smartphones
and constant online communication, social networking can present a professional
dilemma. For every success story about a company making its mark online, there
seem to be a dozen cautionary
tales of public figures putting their virtual foot in their mouth in real
time, or worse.
More importantly,
from the perspective of a nonprofit organization, cultivating a social media
following and
All images courtesy of FFLC.
maintaining multiple online profiles takes time and effort. Is
the potential payoff worth it for an organization devoted to helping people in
the community, not bolstering its bottom line?
Last week, I sat down with Dawn Marie Woodward to talk about
adding social media to a nonprofit’s traditional communications toolkit.
Woodward, the president of the Greater Oregon Chapter of the Public Relations
Society of America, serves as events and media relations coordinator for FOOD for Lane County (FFLC).
The Eugene Weekly included this story in their Earth Day On Wheels special edition published April 18, 2013.
...................................................................................................................................................
We’re living in a golden age of cycling. And we might have a bunch of loud, traffic-stopping cycling activists with anarchistic tendencies — better known as Critical Mass — to thank for it.
For the uninitiated, Critical Mass (CM) is a quasi-organized monthly bike ride that takes place on the last Friday of the month in cities across the globe. Founded in San Francisco in September 1992, the ride is part-rolling street party, part-pro-cycling demonstration, often chaotic and a heck of a good time — minus the occasional arrest — but, hey, even those can have side benefits.
True, cyclists on CM rides have run red lights to stay with the pack to the ire of drivers stuck idling at green lights. And in some cities CM rides draw controversy and cops like magnets. But in the pre-Lance Armstrong era — before charity fundraising rides became popular and hipsters discovered single speeds — CM played a big role in raising public awareness of cycling as a sustainable community choice and part of a healthy lifestyle.
Critter Cruise at Kesey Square on April 4. Photo by Eugene Weekly
In its heyday, Eugene’s CM made plenty of headlines due to an overly aggressive police crackdown in the summer of 2006. Since then, the local CM ride has petered out — replaced by less overtly political and confrontational group rides that local cycling enthusiasts organize via word of mouth and social media, such as the “Critter Cruise” that pedaled off from Kesey Square April 4.
In 1991, a year before the first Critical Mass, the federal government spent a measly $4 to $6 million annually on cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. By 2008 that figure had grown to $541 million, according to government data. Between 2001 and 2011 alone, national bike use rose by 39 percent.
In late January I blogged about the ongoing fight by the small farm community to keep canola out of the Willamette Valley and the danger the plant,
also know as rapeseed, poses to the area’s thriving specialty seed industry. At the time, the Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) was taking public
testimony on the issue before finalizing a rule change that would have allowed
canola to be planted on thousands of previously restricted acres in the valley.
Current House Bill 2427, entitled the “Willamette Valley
Canola Ban”, would block any canola planting in “Clackamas, Linn, Marion,
Multnomah, Polk, Washington
and Yamhill Counties
and the portion of Benton and Lane
Counties lying east of the summit of
the Coast Range.”
FFF’s Leah Rodgers
says that while legislators are voicing support for the local seed industry, many
are leery of the idea of a ban and used to deferring to the experts at the ODA.
This news brief first appeared in the Eugene Weekly onthe November/December 2012 edition of In Good Tilth,
the magazine of Oregon
Tilth. I am currently working on a in depth piece on farm financing.
It’s no big secret that Oregon’s
farmer population is aging. On the other hand, increasing demand for
locally produced food provides opportunities for a new generation of
sustainably minded growers to develop successful farms — if they can get
financing, that is.
A group of farmers and agriculture experts recently testified before
the state Legislature on the difficulties small farmers, especially
those new to the profession, face getting the credit necessary to
purchase farmland or farm equipment. Though some Oregon farmers may
qualify for the federal Farm Service Agency’s (FSA) Beginning Farmers
and Ranchers Loans program, the state does not have its own credit
program to assist inexperienced farmers break into the business.
On Feb. 12, the Oregon House Committee on Agriculture and Natural
Resources held a hearing on HB 2700, which would create a Beginning and
Expanding Farmer Loan Program to help farmers with less than 10 years
experience buy land, equipment, livestock and seed. The program would
utilize private bonds exempt from federal taxes, known as “aggie bonds,”
which can be bundled with existing FSA lending programs and can lower
loan interest rates by as much as 25 percent. Sixteen states already
offer aggie bonds.
A version of this article first ran in the December 2010 edition of the Oregon Insider, a private monthly digest of environmental management and regulatory news. With Hanford in the news this month for a newly reported single-shell container leak, it seems appropriate to publish an updated version of the story.
On Friday, February 15, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee announced the first confirmed leak of high-level radioactive waste at the Hanford nuclear site since 2005. The site of America's first nuclear reactor and one of the largest nuclear waste sites in the world has drawn relatively little of the renewed press scrutiny other nuclear facilities have faced in the wake of Japan's Fukushima meltdown. On the other hand, you might say that Hanford
is always in the back of the Pacific Northwest’s mind.
The name Hanford has become
synonymous with the atomic age and radiation pollution. But how much does the
region know about the intricacies of the massive and massively expensive
ongoing cleanup effort?
Covering hundreds of square miles of sage-brush filled
backcountry on the Columbia River in southern Washington,
Hanford is the most contaminated
site in the Western Hemisphere. Known by various names,
including the Hanford Engineering Works, the Hanford Nuclear Reservation and
finally the Hanford site, the
complex comprises multiple nuclear reactors, processing plants, laboratories
and associated buildings and waste dumps. Because of the nature of nuclear
research and production undertaken during Hanford’s
four decades of operation, the site’s contamination presents a hugely
complex long term problem. While progress has been made, the $2
billion-per-year cleanup is behind schedule and over budget.